home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- USER-DOC Working Group
- Chairpersons: Tracy LaQuey/Univ of Texas and Karen Roubicek/BBN,NNSC
-
-
-
-
-
- CURRENT MEETING REPORT
- Reported by Karen Roubicek
-
-
-
- AGENDA
-
-
- o Review Charter, Objectives, Timeframe
-
- o Review and revise bibliography outline
-
- o Review the documents we have to-date and make additions
-
- o Clarify location and maintainer of bibliography as it is being written
-
- o Define format, contents of entries
-
- o Identify volunteers to write abstracts
-
- o Define the review process for selecting documents for inclusion in
- bibliography.
-
- o Determine where bibliography will live after initial publication and
- discuss maintenance/review/update in the future
-
- o Identify sources for information and determine who will take
- responsibility for soliciting it.
-
- o Clarify how to distribute bibliography to users
-
-
- ATTENDEES
-
-
- 1. Armstrong, Karen, armstrongk@sds.sdsc.edu
-
- 2. Bowers, Karen, kbowers@nri.reston.va.us
-
- 3. Breeden, Laura, breeden@bbn.com
-
- 4. Easterday, Tom, tom@nisca.ircc.ohio-state.edu
-
- 5. Enger, Robert M., enger@sccgate.scc.com
-
- 6. Finkelson, Dale, dmf@westie.unl.edu
-
- 7. Hallgren, Martyne M., martyne@tcgould.tn.cornell.edu
-
- 8. LaQuey, Tracy, tracy@emx.utexas.edu
-
- 9. Marine, April, april@nic.ddn.mil
-
- 10. Miller, Stephen, miller@m2c.org
-
- 11. Moore, Berlin, bm24@andrew.cmu.edu
-
- 12. Morris, Don, morris@ncar.ucar.edu
-
- 13. Oattes, Lee, oattes@utcs.utoronto.ca
-
- 14. Perillo, Francine, perillo@cisco.com
-
- 15. Pleasant, Mel, pleasant@rutgers.edu
-
- 16. Pugh, Jon, pugh@nmfecc.llnl.gov
-
- 17. Redfield, Elizabeth, red@nic.ddn.mil
-
- 18. Reynolds, Joyce K., jkrey@venera.isi.edu
-
- 19. Roubicek, Karen, roubicek@nnsc.nsf.net
-
- 20. Sitzler, Dana, dds@merit.edu
-
- 21. Stahl, Mary, stahl@nic.ddn.mil
-
- 22. Steinberg, Lou, louiss@ibm.com
-
-
-
- 2
- 23. Sweeton, Jim, sweeton@merit.edu
-
- 24. Veach, Ross, rrv@seka.cso.uiuc.edu
- 25. Wintringham, Dan, danw@osc.edu
-
-
- 26. Yuan, Aileen, aileen@gateway.mitre.org
-
-
- MINUTES
-
- A few members of the User Services Working Group, who were attending a
- FARNET meeting on May 31, met with Karen Bowers for a short time to form a
- distinct group to create the userdoc bibliography. The July 25 IETF session
- therefore was the first formal meeting of the USER-DOC Working Group.
-
- The meeting began with a review of the charter of the USER-DOC Working
- Group. To summarize, the purpose of the group is to prepare a bibliography
- of online and hardcopy documents, reference materials, and training tools
- addressing general networking information and "how to use the Internet".
- End users and people who help end users are the targeted audience. The
- group had already identified several documents since the first USWG meeting
- in Texas and described some broad categories to cover prior to this meeting.
- We had originally set mid-December 1989 as the publication date of the
- bibliography but by the end of this meeting we agreed to issue a first draft
- by the Hawaii IETF.
-
- A discussion of subject areas to be covered in the bibliography identified
- the following topics:
-
-
- o Introduction to TCP/IP
-
- o Guide for network administrators
-
- o Electronic Mail
-
- o Services Documents (Directories, Libraries)
-
- o Mailing Lists
-
- o RFCs
-
- o Map Collections (pointers to)
-
- o Workshops and Conferences
-
- o Servers
-
- o Security
-
- o Newsletters
-
-
- This list of categories is not exhaustive, nor is it set in stone. Tracy
- suggested that including indexes of keywords will help us out with documents
- or materials that will be difficult to fit into specific categories.
- Several members felt that where possible, entries should have a designated
- level of expertise associated with them. The group agreed that it would
- only be realistic to rank a document as "beginner" or "novice" and
- "intermediate and above".
-
- Don Morris expressed an interest in listing helpful tools or applications,
- such as the NCAR Internet Remote Job Entry System. The group decided that
- although the bibliography was not the right place to include such
- references, another working group could be formed for that purpose.
-
- An important feature of the bibliography is that it be comprehensive enough
- to be useful but not so large as to be overwhelming. Toward this goal,
- Joyce Reynolds will provide a list of key RFCs to serve as a basic set. We
- identified a category for documents that describe how to use available
- servers, particularly those servers on non-Internet networks such as BITNET
- and SPAN. Since large numbers of users on the Internet want to use these
- facilities, the group decided to include such descriptive documents as are
-
-
-
- 3
- available and concluded that some may have to be written specifically for
- the bibliography.
-
- The question of including articles from periodicals was raised and some
-
- members expressed concern that it would be difficult to keep up with all
- journal articles and that the bibliography might become unwieldy. We agreed
- that unless an article were very unusual (of the variety: Notable Computer
- Networks by John Quarterman), we would not include it. A special issue of a
- periodical devoted entirely to one particular topic or issue may be
- included.
-
- We reviewed the current list of references and added some new ones. The
- materials referenced in the bibliography will not be limited to text, but
- will include audiotapes, videotapes and regularly scheduled workshops and
- conferences.
-
- Tracy is currently maintaining the bibliography at emx.utexas.edu and will
- continue to do so through the first draft in October. The group will decide
- on the future of the bibliography at the next IETF meeting.
-
- We provisionally chose Refer as a format for the bibliography. Standard
- bibliographic requirements will be included (name, author, keywords, etc) as
- well as some additional fields such as copyright information, length, order
- source/pathname, version, obsoletes/updates, type of media and format.
- Elizabeth Redfield and April Marine from SRI discussed the current work on a
- NIC bibliography database. Their efforts are considerably larger in scope
- than ours (current number of documents is greater than 2,000). The
- importance of keeping in touch with developments in the library community
- and documentation retrieval technology was mentioned. Laura Breeden
- referred to CMU's Andrew project and Karen Bowers cited NRI's Digital
- Library project. Two committees were established to facilitate the
- publication process: an "editorial board" (Jon Pugh, Karen Bowers, Tracy
- LaQuey, Francine Perillo, Joyce Reynolds, and April Marine) will review the
- entries for appropriateness and accuracy; and Dale Finkelson, Jon Pugh and
- representatives from the DDN NIC will constitute a group which will do the
- work to flesh out the entries.
-
- To facilitate the discussion about format and obtaining further
- bibliographic references, the attendees formed two groups to go off and
- pursue those issues and reconvene after an hour. April and Elizabeth had
- expressed some concern over the compatibility of the USER-DOC bibliography
- in Refer with the NIC's bibliographic efforts, so the group decided that the
- NIC would include the USER-DOC entries in their database. They will also
- pass on their template for possible use by the USER-DOC WG. The group
- focusing on obtaining entries for the bibliography identified a list of
- individuals, groups and organizations, and mailing lists from which we will
- solicit information. Members of the working group will take advantage of
- meetings that we attend to gather information from the participants, a
- specific example being the IETF meeting itself. We decided that together
- with members of the NOC-Tools Working Group we would compose a brief handout
- requesting material for both the NOC-Tools catalog and the bibliography.
- This was passed out at the Plenary session on Thursday morning with a
- request to return suggestions that afternoon. We received a handful of
- contributions.
-
- In discussing how to effectively distribute the bibliography to users, we
- concluded that the issue has relevance beyond just the USER-DOC Working
- Group, and Karen Bowers volunteered to set up a separate session on Thursday
- under the USWG umbrella to investigate methods of distribution (see USWG
- report).
-
- ACTION ITEMS:
-
-
-
- 4
- o Write up and pass out questionnaire at Plenary Session: Enger,
- Roubicek, Bowers
-
- o Develop Template (LaQuey, Marine, Redfield, Roubicek)
-
- o Define set of key RFCs (Reynolds)
-
- o Research Andrew system and Federal databases (Breeden)
-
- o Contact Paul re: SOCRATES project (Breeden)
-
- o Choose set of mailing lists (Roubicek, Bowers)
-
- o Liaison with library community (Roubicek)
-
- o Schedule distribution meeting (Bowers)
-
- o Write article about bibliography for ConneXions soliciting information
- (Perillo)
-
-
- PRELIMINARY AGENDA for next meeting:
-
-
- o Review first draft of bibliography
-
- o Make final choice of format
-
- o Establish permanent location(s) and maintainer(s) for bibliography
-